The Black Hills Ecosystem
(more
photos coming soon!)
Authors and scientists Wayne Shepperd and Michael Battaglia1
describe the Black Hills ecosystem this way:
“The Black Hills is a forested refuge on the Missouri
Plateau of the Great Plains Province2. This refuge spans 125 miles from north to south and 60 miles
from east to west3. The
total land base is nearly 6,000 square miles, with two-thirds of the area in
southwest South Dakota and one third in northeast Wyoming4.
The Black Hills and neighboring Bear Lodge Mountains to the
west were formed by a regional uplift of the Earth’s surface during the
Laramide mountain-building episodes that produced most of the ranges of the
Rocky Mountains several million years ago.
Granites pushing up beneath overlying sedimentary formations formed this
maturely dissected domed uplift5.
The uplift is elliptical in shape, with a crystalline (granite) core,
which occupies about 20 percent of the Black Hills area.
The core is encircled by steeply dipping sedimentary deposits.
As a general rule, the closer a (rock) formation is to the center of the
Black Hills, the older its age6.
These distinct differences in geology across the Black Hills affect
vegetation distribution and growth.”
The resilient, bountiful forests of this land and the
promise of rare mineral exploration moved the political leaders of the time to
commission George Armstrong Custer on an expedition here in 1874.
Custer’s expedition paved the way for rapid European settlement, so the
Black Hills have experienced forest management in some form or another for over
100 years. Bear in mind, as you
drive through our oasis of the high plains, that the beauty of the Black Hills
has in part been shaped by the hand of forest managers - long have we lived in
harmony with the forest, and with the support of people like you, we will
continue to do so long after today.
In the many eons before we got here, however, three
discrete forces of nature were chiefly responsible for how the Black Hills’
forests developed: climate, wildfire, and insects.
Wildfire: The historic fire regime of the Black Hills is thought to
have been two-tiered. One component
consisted of frequent (as often as once a year), low-intensity ground fires
which served to thin the forest of seedlings, saplings and woody debris.
These fires were prevalent in the more arid portions of the forest, and
served to generate and maintain sparse, open, park-like forest conditions with mature
‘yellow-bark’ or ‘yellow-bellied’ pines. The
second fire regime component was considerably less subtle; it was characterized
by relatively large fire events that burned down entire stands of trees at a
time. This type of fire is thought
to have been common in areas with higher annual precipitation, but burned much
with less frequency, perhaps occurring on one hundred-year intervals or more.
These events generated continuous patches of younger trees, growing up in
dense conditions from the ashes of the forest that preceded them.
As a result of these to very different wildfire scenarios, the Black
Hills were characterized by widely varying forest conditions.
Over time, and as a result of fire suppression policies, this system
seems to have skewed toward the latter component, and the fires of today are
larger, more frequent, and more destructive than those of days past.
Forest insects: Insects are ever-present catalysts of change in every
forest system. In the Black Hills,
a small native insect called the mountain pine beetle serves this role.
Mountain pine beetles prey on trees growing under stressed conditions,
such as the intense competition for light, nutrients, and water that develops
when trees are allowed to grow too closely together.
Historically, mountain pine beetles in the Black Hills have oscillated
between small, confined, or ‘endemic’
populations and large outbreaks, or ‘epidemics’. General
Land Office and Forest Service accounts dating back to the late 1800s tell us of
large mountain pine beetle events in several parts of the Black Hills, and on
what appears to be a recurring ten-year cycle, beetles have reared their head to
devour several thousand acres at a time. Since
this time, science has learned much about managing the negative effects that
large beetle outbreaks can incur upon the forest.
Through years of rigorous study, it was determined that keeping beetles
at low levels is as simple as thinning the forest
to more open conditions.
This open forest condition creates unfavorable “habitat” for the
beetles, mostly because the trees are growing vigorously and can defend
themselves against attack.
It should be noted that the Black Hills are in the midst of
a terribly serious beetle outbreak, but something is different this time than in
years past - the bugs aren’t stopping their march at several thousand acres.
Current data on mountain pine beetle activity
shows that
something more like tens of thousands of acres could be affected, if forest
managers cannot step in soon. Insect
experts on the forest have described the situation as having the potential to
turn into ‘Beetle-geddon’, largely due to the presence of very contiguous,
over-dense stands of trees that are prime “food” for mountain pine beetles.
For more about mountain pine beetles, see our article
later in this section.
References:
1.
RMRS-GTR-97, 2002
2.
Hoffman, G.R.; Alexander, R. R. 1987. Forest vegetation of the Black Hills
National Forest of South Dakota and Wyoming: a habitat type classification. Res.
Pap. RM-276. Ft. Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mt. Research
Station. 48p.
3.
Fenneman, N. M.; 1931. Physiography of Western United States.
New York: McGraw-Hill book company, Inc. 534p.
4.
Froiland, S. G. 1990.
Natural History of the Black Hills and Badlands.
Sioux Falls, SD: Center for Western Studies, Augustana College.
225p.
5.
Orr, H. K. 1975.
Watershed management in the Black Hills: the status of our knowledge. Res.
Pap. RM-141. Ft. Collins, COL USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mt. Research
Station. 7p.
6. Raventon, E. 1994. Island in the plains: a Black Hills natural history. Boulder, CO: Johnson Books, 272p.